A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE Revisionists herein are the tenants. The Respondent- landlord filed two petitions for eviction, R. C. Nos. 2 and 3 of 1976 on the grounds of wilful default and bonafide requirement of the schedule premises for the proposed commencement of his business. The eviction petitions have been filed under Section 10 (3) (b) (iii) and Section 10 (2) (i) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). R. C. No. 2/76 briefly states : The petitioner (landlord) purchased the building Door Nos. 2/48, 2/49 and 2/50 on the westetfrside oftheg. N. T. Road in Tagarapuvalasa under a registered sale-deed dated 26-6-69. Actual possession was given in so far as D. No. 2/50 is concerned and symbolic possession in respect of D. Nos. 2/48 and 2/49 which were occupied by the two tenants, who are the two revisionists herein, was given. After the purchase the tenants assured to pay the rents to the petitioner. The petitioner purchased the building for the purposes of his business and therefore a notice was caused to be issued on 1-6-69 to vacate the building. Since it was not vacated the petitioner (landlord) filed a suit O. S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document