RAMA RAO
Mohd. MOONUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
A. YADAGIRI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner in this petition arising under the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1960 is the landlord. The petition was failed by the landlord under Section 10 of the Rent Control Act for eviction of the respondent from the Malgi bearing Municipal No. 21-2-267 situated at Lad bazar, Hyderabad on grounds of wilful default in payment, of rent and personal requirement. The petitioner purchased the said malgi on 19-8-1969. The allegation in the petit on is that there was a failure to pay the rent evidently with a view to harass the petitioner since the said purchase and thus the respondent committed wilful default in payment of rent. In so far as the bonafide requirement for personal occupation is concerned, the petitioner stated that he intended to start the bangle shop of his own in the Malgi. It is also further stated that there is congregation of bangle shops in the Lad bazar and hence the Malgi is most appropriate one for starting Bangle business. The petitioner was having sufficient capital and there is no premises of his own and he is not in the possesion of any other premises in the city of Hyderabad for doing bangles business. The resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.