SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 303

A.SEETHARAM REDDY
Kishan Chand – Appellant
Versus
Sayeeda Khatoon – Respondent


A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS rent revision by the tenant raises a sole but rather important question as to whether as to whether under sec. 110 of the T. P. Act if the instrument of lease is silent with regard to the commencement of the lease, the first day as per the implied commencement within the meaning of second limb of sec. 110 will have to be excluded in computing the time. Within which a notice to be given by landlord for the termination of tenancy.

( 2 ) THE format of the case in brief is The lease agreement was entered into on 16/02/1971 a between the revisionist-tenant and the landlady-respondent in respect of the demised premises, H. No. 3-3-71/2. Kachiguda, hyderabad, on a monthly rent of Rs. 150. 00 for a period of eleven months with a stipulation therein that the tenancy may be continued by the landlady after the expiry of eleven months on the same terms and conditions after the stipulated period the tenancy, however continued and came to be treated as a tenancy by holding over from month to month. After a decade the landlady gave a notice of termination under Ex. A-7 stating that the tenant has contravened the stipulation of the lease agreement by using the premi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top