SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 297

A.SEETHARAM REDDY
MOHD HAFEEZ – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. AKBAR SIDDIQUI – Respondent


A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision the petitioner seeks to revise the order of the district Munsif, Sangareddy dt. 10th November 1980 allowing T. A. No. 254 of 1980 filed by the respondents herein under Or 1 rule 10 CPC to implead them as respondents to the O. P. filed by the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE circumstances leading to the revision are as follows: The petitioner filed O. P. No. 6 of 1977 in the District Munisif s court, Sanga reddy for grant of a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act for withdrawing an amount of Rs. 3122-40 Ps. which was deposited by his father Mohd. Salar in the State Bank of Hyderabad, Sangareddy branch, the respondrnts filed a claim petition in I-A. No. 235 of 1977 claiming that they are entitled to the certificate under a will executed by the late Mohd. Salar and therefore the certificate may be granted in their favour. It was however dismissed and Civil Revision petition filed against the said order also met with the same fate in this court. Thereafter, I. A. No. 151 of 1979 was filed by the respondents raising a new plea that a compromise was arrived at between the revision petitioner and his father late Mohd. Salar in A. S. No. 1













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top