SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 314

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
Bukka Swamulu – Appellant
Versus
Director of Animal Husbandry, Hyderabad – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioners are residents of Penuballi, kothagudem taluk, Khammam district. The 1st petitioner is the sarpanch of the said penuballi Gram Panchayat. They questioned the order, dated 20th October, 1981, passed by the Director of Animal Husbandry, shifting the live stock Supervisory Unit from Penuballi to Paladugu. It is alleged in the affidavit that the said centre was established during ths regime of the former Chief Minister sri J. Vengala Rao, and the present move including that of the 4th respondent who is a member of the Legislative Assembly is intended to mar the influence of Sri Vengala Rao in this district as they have already shifted one electric sub-station and these things are motivated and done at the influence of the 4th respondent. Further it is alleged that the said order was passed without any notice or enquiry or without any opportunity to the villagers who are enjoying the benefit of this live stock Supervisory Unit, since the year 1976. It is also urged that even the Gram Panchayat where the unit is situated was not consulted.

( 2 ) THE Director of Animal Husbandry filed a counter denynig the allegations of the motive and also stated that considering the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top