SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 404

P.A.CHOUDHARY, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
Food Corporation of India, represented by Senior Regional Manager Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
B. Chittibubu – Respondent


KODANDA RAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of Miscellaneous appeals arise out of applications filed under Sec 20 of the Indian Arbitration act seeking direction from the civil court against the Food Corporation of india directing the Corporation to file the arbitration agreement dated 10-1-81 and to make a reference to the arbitrator as provided under the said agreement. The suits were decreed as prayed for. The Corporation filed the above appeals questioning the Judgment and decree of the Civil Court.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the corporation raised two questions and both of them rest on the contruction of the arbitration agreement dated 10-1-81 thouoh the agreement in these suits are entered on different dates the terms of agreements are identical as the corporation entered into those agreements with the parties with the same set of terms in all these cases and hence it is enough if we state facts in one case. The piaintifs case is that they are contracting parties with the corporation entrusted with the handling of transport contact work transporting the goods from the Corporation depot to the railway station and also godowns of the corporation. In C. M. A. No. 565/82 it was stat











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top