SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 425

P.A.CHOUDHARY, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
JAVVADI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
PYBOYINA MANIKYAM – Respondent


RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) "in view of the pursutnce of the question verified in the second appeal, and not covered by any authority I am of opinion that the Second appeal should be posted before a Division Bench, the papers may be placed before the Hon ble the Chief Justice for appropriate order. "pursuant to the order of Reference by ramanujulu Naidu. J. dt. 18-12-79 this Second Appeal came op for final hearing on 2-11-1982 before a Division Bench of this court, consirting of P. A. Choudary J. and kodandaramayya, J. and the court delivered the following. JUDGMENT

( 2 ) THIS appeal is referred by our learned brother Ramanujulu naidu, J. , as it involves interpretation of Sec. 16 of the Transfer of Property act.

( 3 ) THE facts are not in dispute but only iti effect in Law. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. One P, Muthiah had a son ganga Raju and executed a settlement deed in respect of the suit property conferring life estate on his son and after his death to the sons of Ganga raju to be born abso utely. Ganga Raju in his turn executed a relinquishment deed of his life estate got under Ex. A-3 in favour of his father muthaiah on 31-8-1934 under Ex. A-4. Ganga












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top