P.A.CHOUDHARY, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
JAVVADI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
PYBOYINA MANIKYAM – Respondent
( 1 ) "in view of the pursutnce of the question verified in the second appeal, and not covered by any authority I am of opinion that the Second appeal should be posted before a Division Bench, the papers may be placed before the Hon ble the Chief Justice for appropriate order. "pursuant to the order of Reference by ramanujulu Naidu. J. dt. 18-12-79 this Second Appeal came op for final hearing on 2-11-1982 before a Division Bench of this court, consirting of P. A. Choudary J. and kodandaramayya, J. and the court delivered the following. JUDGMENT
( 2 ) THIS appeal is referred by our learned brother Ramanujulu naidu, J. , as it involves interpretation of Sec. 16 of the Transfer of Property act.
( 3 ) THE facts are not in dispute but only iti effect in Law. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. One P, Muthiah had a son ganga Raju and executed a settlement deed in respect of the suit property conferring life estate on his son and after his death to the sons of Ganga raju to be born abso utely. Ganga Raju in his turn executed a relinquishment deed of his life estate got under Ex. A-3 in favour of his father muthaiah on 31-8-1934 under Ex. A-4. Ganga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.