SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 457

A.RAGHUVIR, RAMA RAO
Shantilal Bazaz – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Council, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


RAMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants are the appellants. This appeal arises out of a suit filed for recovery of a sum of Rupees 34,304. 04 p. Including the warrant fee of re. 0. 12p. being the house tax due from the defendants on the suit schedule building for the years 1968-69 to 1971-72. The break-up for the said years is: 1968-69. . . . . . . Rs. 4,096. 90 1969-70. . . . . . Rs. 4,596. 90 1970-71. . . . . . . Rs. 4,229. 08 1971-72. . . . . . . Rs. 4,229. 08 The averments in the plaint are that the plaintiff is entitled to assess and collect the property tax in respect of houses and lands within the Municipal limits of visakhapatnam. The defendants are the owners of a house situated in ward No. 20 and the schedule property was assessed to municipal tax for the years 1968-69 to 1971-72. As the defendants are the owners of the house, they are under an obligation to pay the tax but failed to pay the amounts in spite of demand and a warrant.

( 2 ) THE 1st defendant filed a written statement and the 2nd defendant adopted the same. The 1st defendant admitted that the defendants are the owners of the plaint schedule building but averred that the assessment made by the plaintiff for payment
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top