SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 456

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Jeeth Kaur – Appellant
Versus
P. Kondalamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of the judgment of the additional chief judge, city civil Court, hyderabad dated 21-10-1978 in A. S. No. 66 of 1977 reversing the decree and judgment of the VII Assistant Judge, city civil Court, Hyderabad in O. S. No. 205 of 1973.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs are the appellants. The first plaintiff heera Bai is the widow of one Harnam singh. The 2nd plaintiff is the daughter and plaintiffs 3 and 4 and 2nd defendant are the sons. The suit is filed for a declaration of the plaintiffs right of occupancy as tenants of building bearing No. 4-7-649 situate in Esamia bazar, Hyderabad belonging to the first defendant kondalamma.

( 3 ) HARNAM singh, the husband of the first plaintiff was inducated into the suit building as tenant by the predecessor-in-title of defendant No. 1 plaintiffs 1 to 4 and defendant No. 2 were residing with Harnam singh in the suit building paying the rents regularly. Harnam singh died on 18-9-1957. Even after the death of Harnam singh, plaintiffs and defendant No. 2 continued to reside in the suit building. Defendant No. 2 was paying the rent up to November 2 along with his family shifted to a police quarter allotted to him by the Gover











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top