SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 8

PUNNAIAH
T. Bhaskar Rao – Appellant
Versus
T. Gabriel – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision the order passed by the Principal District Munsif in O. S. No. 350/78 refusing to admit the document sought to be received by the plaintiff on the ground that it was insufficiently stamped and unregistered, is challenged. The petitioner filed the suit O. S. No. 350/78 for recovery of possession of plaint A schedule property measuring 0-49 cents. The plaintiff was examined as P. W. 1 and he tendered exchange deed dated 14-6-1958 in support of his case as to possession. The plaintiff wanted to prove that possession was delivered to respondent in pursuance of the document in question. According to the plaintiff, the first plaintiff purchased A schedule property measuring 0-49 cents under a registered sale deed dated 6-5-1958 from the defendant and obtained possession in pursuance of the sale deed. At that time the defendants father was in possession of B schedule properly measuring 0. 34 cents. The plaintiff and the defendant wanted to have exchange of these two properties. The plaintiff agreed to exchange A schedule property measuring 0-49 cents for 0-34 cents of B schedule property belonging to the defendant and the defendant agreed for the same. H
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top