SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 38

A.RAGHUVIR, A.SEETHARAM REDDY
NAGPUR NAGARIK SAHAKARI BANK Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


SEETHARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) FIRST defendant is the appellant. Union of India filed the suit O. S. No. 256 of 1971 on the file of City Civil Court, Hyderabad for recovery of rs. 46,644-75 being the balance of Bank guarantee payable by the first defendant to the plaintiff, against the first defendant and in the alternative, against defendants 1 and 2 and for subsequent interest from the date of the suit at 6% per annum till the date of recovery and for costs.

( 2 ) THE plaint averments are:the second defendant was appointed by the plaintiff as the sole advertising agent to procure advertisements in the Telephone Directories for a total of five issues commencing from July, 1965. An agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and the second defendent on 6-4-1965. As per clause 4 of the said agreement the second defendant gave Bank guarantee by the first defendant Bank on 30-4-1965 for the due performance by him of the terms of the agreement. As per the Bank guarantee, the Bank is liable for a sum not exceeding Rs. 47,325-75 if the second defendant failed to perform his part of the contract. The issues of the Directory were published during July, 1965, Jan. 1966, August, 1966, Febua





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top