SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 37

PUNNAIAH
RAMESH CHANDRA SARADA – Appellant
Versus
PHOOLCHAND SONI – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) IN these revisions, the orders of the V Additional Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad in I. A. No. 916/1979 and I. A. No. 962/1978 in O. S, no. 589/77 are assailed,

( 2 ) THE suit was filed by the petitioner herein for specific performance of an agreement of sale executed by the 2nd respondent who is the defendant in the suit and for possession of the ground floor of the building. The defendant put the plaintiff in possession of the first floor in pursuance of the agreement of sale. Phoolchand Soni (1st respondent in C. R. P. No. 983/80) the biother of the defendant filed I. A. No. 916/79 praying that he should be impleaded as party on the ground that the party belonged to the joint family and he has got equal share with the defendant in the property as member of the joint family. Smt. Kami Bai (1st respondent in G. R. P. No. 984/80) the lister of the defendant also filed I. A. No. 962/78 praying that she should be impleaded in the suit on the ground that the property belonged to their father and she is entitled to l/6th share. The learned Additional Judge allowed both the petitions holding that the parties sought to be impleaded have interest in the property which






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top