SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 112

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
M. Akkamma – Appellant
Versus
M. Jagannadham – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal preferred under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the wife is the appellant. Her husband, Midathada Jugannadham, filed an applicition under Sections 10 and 13 of the Act for dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground that his wife, Akkamma, has been living in adultery with Pailasuri Demudu, the second respondent in the application since October, 1958. The learned Additional Subordinate Judge allowed the application of the husband. The wife has now come up in appeal.

( 2 ) THE events leading to the matrimonial dispute between the spouses may be shortly stated: Midathada Jagannadham married Akkamma, the daughter of his maternal uncle when she was a child of 10 years some time in 1928. Akkamma was a sickly woman and did not attain puberty. Jagannadham, married Demudamma in about 1938. It is the case Jagannadham that be married Demudamma after her marriage with her first husband was dissolved according to the custom of the community, while it is the case of Akkamma that Demudamma lived only as a concubine of Jagannadham and that the marriage with her first husband was not diss

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top