SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 113

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Y. Peda Venkayya – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur – Respondent


B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is preferred against an endorsement of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, dated 2-3-1981, informing the petitioner that he is not competent to revise the orders passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Guntur, who had impounded certain documents produced by the petitioner hi a suit, and which were sent to the R. D. O. The writ petition arises in the following circumstances:--

( 2 ) PETITIONER is the plaintiff in O. Section No. 17 of 1979, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Guntur. While P. W. 2 was being examined on his behalf, the petitioner (plaintiff) wanted to have three documents admitted in evidence through P. W. 2. Immediately thereupon, an objection was raised by the defendants about the admissibility of the documents under the provisions of the Stamp Act. It appears that the Court, thereupon, sent the original documents to the Collector (Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur), for impounding the same. The R. D. O. , however, returned the documents to the Court stating that, according to law, the documents have to be impounded first by the Court before which they are produced and then sent to the Collector












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top