SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 188

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
Deram Seethamahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Kala Seethamahalakshmamma – Respondent


KODANDA RAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE contenders to the custody of the child the paternal grand mother and the maternal grand father have celebrated this cause. It is very unfortunate that in this family continuously for two generations there was a premature death of the manager and hence the present apathy among the members of the family disclosed in these proceedings.

( 2 ) THE sole respondent in this appeal-one Kala Seethamahalakshmamma filed O. P. No. 149/1978 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil court Hyderabad under Sec. 13 of the hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 32 of 1956 and Sec. 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act 8 of 1890 for the custody of the minor Kala Gopa! Krishna kumar. The present appellants are the respondents as in the O. P. The 1st respondent is the mother of minor kala Gopala Krishna Kumar son of late k V S. Viswanadha Sarma and the petitioner in the OP. is the mother of the said K V S. Viswanadha Sarma and the paternal grand mother of the minor ka\b Gopala Krishna Kumar. The 2nd respondent is the 2nd husband of the 1st respondent Seethamahalakshmi alias dabir Latha whom she married after the death of her first husband K V S. Viswanadha Sarma. Th 3rd respondent






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top