SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 232

K.A.MUKTADAR
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Gnaneshwar Rao – Respondent


K. A. MUKTADAR, J.

( 1 ) THE State has referred this revision against the order dated 26-10-1978 passed by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Nizamabad, excluding pote kharab lands from the holding of the respondent declarant.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the contentions advanced by the learned Government Pleader, it is necessary to state certain facts. The respondent filed his declaration and eventually after enquiry he was found to be holding land in excess of the standard holding. Thereafter, proceedings under S. 10, Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 were initiated and the respondent was called upon to surrender the land. The respondent declarant filed a petition before the Primary Tribunal in proceedings under S. 10 of the Act, to exclude pote kharab extent from the holding of the respondent. That petition was dismissed. The respondent preferred an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal which allowed the appeal and excluded the pote kharab lands from the holding of the respondent. Aggrieved by the said order of the Appellate Tribunal, the State has preferred this revision.

( 3 ) MR. Gopalakrishna Murthy, the learned Assistant Government Pleader



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top