SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 288

P.A.CHOUDHARY
Vantaku Appalanaidu – Appellant
Versus
Peddinti Demudamma – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of a judgment and decree passed by District Judge, Vizag in A. S. No. 156/77 confirming an order of the District Munsifs Court, Chodavaram, passed in I. A. No. 102/76 in O. S. 93/70, in the court of the District Munsif, Chodavaram, the aforesaid I. A. No. 102/76 was filed by the present respondents under Order 26, Rule 30 of the Civil Procedure Code, praying that they might be brought on record as the legal representatives of the deceased-plaintiff in O. S. No. 93/70 D. M. C. Chodavaram, and a final decree might be passed against the present appellants who were the judgment debtors in the aforesaid suit. The present appellants opposed that I. A. 102/76. But both the courts below granted the relief to the present respondents. The defendants judgment-debtors filed this second appeal complaining against the orders of the District Judge.

( 2 ) O. S. No. 93/70 on the file of the District Munsif, Chodavaram, was filed by the sole plaintiff for partition and separate possession of 1/4th share of the plaint schedule properties. To that suit, the present appellants wee added as the defendants. On context that suit was dismissed by the l








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top