( 1 ) TWO points arise which are common to all these three Civil Revision Petitions. The first is that Acre 12. 50 cents of land said to have been held under an agreement of sale exhibit A-2, dated 27th July, 1970 has to be excluded from the holding of the petitioner as it has been amply established by Exhibit a-3, which is an order made on the declaration filed by the vendee. The submission is substantial and the same will have to be allowed not only because of the fact that the sale and also the possession of the vendee been established, but also on the ground that if the extent has been already included in the holding of one declarant the same cannot be included in another person s holding. Viewed from any angle, the contention is cogent and the same has to be allowed. The finding in this behalf given by the Tribunals below is set aside by holding that the revisionists are entitled for exclusion of the extent covered by exhibit A-2 from their holding.

( 2 ) THE second point is, whether the land admittedly located within the urban agglomeration, can be computed in the holding of the petitioners under the Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act. No doubt, this Court ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document