SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 146

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
C. Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. unnisa Begum – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the defendant under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the affirming judgment of our learned brother M. Ramachandra Raju, J. , in C. C. C. A. No. 183 of 1975 preferred against the decree of Second Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in O. S. No. 211 of 1970. The respondent-plaintiff filed the suit to recover the possession of the land of an extent of about 11,000 sq. Yards, comprised in Survey No. 142, in Amberpet, Hyderabad Urban Taluq, or in the alternative to recover damages of a sum of Rs. 11,000 with interest at 9% per annum. The trial Court decreed the suit for possession of the suit land and the appeal preferred by the defendant was also unsuccessful Hence this appeal.

( 2 ) THE material facts giving rise to the litigation between the parties are not much in dispute. The plaintiff executed an agreement of sale, Ex. A-1, dated 6-8-1963 agreeing to sell the suit land to the defendant for a sum of Rs. 11,000. Under the said agreement he received a sum of Rs. 6,000 from the defendant and put the defendant in possession of the suit land. According to the defendant, he subsequently paid a sum of Rs. 4,000 to th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top