SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 173

K.A.MUKTADAR, K.MADHAVA REDDY
Thottadi China Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Adduri Ramulu – Respondent


MADHAVA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in this writ petition is whether a no-confidence motion could be moved against the president of the Board of Directors of the Co-operative Urban Bank and another elected in his place in the absence of a specific provision in the andhra PRADESH CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1964 under which it is registered and the rules and Bye-Laws made thereunder. Pending the writ petition the writ petitioner against whom no-confidence motion was passed sought a direction against the respondents to continue the petitioner as the President and not to treat the 3rd respondent who was elected in his place as the President of Co-operative Urban Bank which was refused by ur learned brother Raghuvir, J. Aggrieved by that order, the petitioner has preferred Writ Appeal No. 217/80.

( 2 ) DURGA Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Vijayawada is a society registered under the A. P. Co-operative Societies Act. The general Body of the said society elected 7 Board of Directors on 31-3-1978 for a period of three years and the Board of Directois in turn elected the petitioner as its President on the same day. The petitioner assumed office and was






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top