SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 170

K.A.MUKTADAR
Vishnu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


K. A. MUKTADAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 341 of 1979 on the file of the Court of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) A private complaint was filed before the V Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad. It was sent for investigation under S. 156 (3) of the Cr. P. C. The Station House Officer, Nampally Police Station, after due investigation, filed the charge-sheet against the accused for offences punishable under sections 120-B, 468 and 471 of the I. P. C.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution is that the complainant is the owner of the shops bearing municipal Nos. 5-7-568 to 5-7-575, situated at Nampally, Hyderabad and that A-3 and A-4 are the tenants. A-1 is the son of A-2. They have cloth business opposite to the shop of the owner i. e. the complainant. The complainant wanted to sell the shops as he was getting very low rent and he made this known to some of the accused. Therefore, A-3 and A-4 were afraid that the shops would be purchased by somebody else and A-3 and A-4 would be asked to vacate these shops. Therefore, A-1 and A-2 with the evil intention of getting the shop for a negligible price conspired with A-3 and A-4 and fabricated a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top