( 1 ) THESE two petitions are to condone the delay of 18 days, if it is there, in filing the review petitions. In support of the petitions, it is stated in the affidavit that the order under review in the L. P. As was pronounced on 7-8-1980 and an application for issuance of a carbon copy of the order was made on 8-8-1980 and the copy was issued on 26-8-1980. The petitioner was advised that the time taken for issuance of the carbon copy would save limitation for purposes of filing the review petitions. The review petitions were filed on 24-9-1980. An application for issuance of a certified copy was not made earlier under the impression that the carbon COPV would be sufficient for filing the review petitions. Therefore, certified copy was not filed alone with the review petitions. It was therefore prayed that the carbon copy be received and the filing of certified copy may be dispensed with. The petitioner was also under the bona fide belief that the time taken in issu-ine the carbon copy would be counted to save limitation and if still it is found that it does not so save limitation, the delay in filing the review petitions may be condoned.

( 2 ) THE respondent file