SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 350

P.A.CHOUDHARY
Tallam Sambasivarao – Appellant
Versus
Sanisetti Bhadrayya – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF was a farmer By farmer s toil, which Adam Smith adored as belonging to the economic category of productive labour, but which gray feared ambition might some time mock at he grew at chillies on his fields. The plaintiff had sola and delivered this produce to the 1st defendant on 26-7 68. But the 1st defendant did not pay him the price of his goods For recovery of the sale price the plaintiff had, therefore filed on 7-12-71 O. S No 1591/71 in the District Munsif s Court, Guntur, The plaintiff claimed a total price ct RE 4,463-46 from the 1st defendant. This amount was arrived at by calculating the price cf the chillies sold with reference to the Guntur Market rate of rew chilles prevailing on 16-4 69 minus Rs. 26-00 The suit was filed beyond 3 years from 26-7-67 although it was within 3 years from 16-4-69. Ihe first defendant filed a written statement contesting the suit. The 1st defendant denied that he ever purchased chillies from the plaintiff. His case was that the goods were en trusted to him to be sold for commission. In paragraph No,4 of his written statement he stated that the 1st defendant never purchased 1129 Kilograms or any quantity out













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top