SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(AP) 333

PUNNAIAH
VASILI SIVA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
VASILI LAKSHMI SUSEELA – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the Additional subordinate Judge, Tenali in I. A. No. 2482/1979 in O. P. No. 159/1979.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the husband of the respondent herein. He filed 0. P. No. 159/79 for the annulment of marriage under Section 12 (d) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Then the respondent filed I. A. No. 2482/79 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the act ) seeking for the interim maintenance and legal expenses pendente lite on the ground that she has no independent income sufficient to maintain her or to meet the necessary expenses of the proceedings in the above mentioned O. P. This I. A. was resisted by the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is also indigent person and he has no independent source of income. The lower Court merely took into consideration the circumstances that the respondent has no independent income and her parents also have no sufficient means to maintain her, that she is now pregnant and she requires medical aid, that it is the duty of the husband to maintain the respondent and children till the petition is decided, that the petitioner is an able bodied man an









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top