SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 2

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA, UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY
SALUKARI ANNAPURNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, LAND REFORMS, PARVATHIPURAM – Respondent


UPENDRALAL WAGHRAY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions under section 21 of the Andhra Pradesh Land reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been referred to a Bench by Madhava Reddy, J. , (as he then was) by order dated. 30-3-1979, because there was difference of opinion in the decisions of single Judges of this Court.

( 2 ) K. Ramachandra Rao, J. , (as he then was) in his judgment dated 3-8-1977 in C. R. P. Nos. 792 to 794/1977 held that a decision rendered by the primary Tribunal on a declaration under Section 8 of the Act after the death of the declarant and without bringing on record his legal representatives or giving them an opportunity in the proceedings for determination of the holding of the deceased is a nullity. (The implication is that the proceedings as such do not abate ).

( 3 ) CHANNAKESAV Reddy, J. , (as he then was) in the judgment reported in A. Appalaswamy Naidu vs. State of A. P. (1) held that in the case of death of a declarant, if no legal representative was brought on record within the time allowed under Article 120 of the LIMITATION ACT, 1963, the proceedings abate (the inference being that surrender cannot be









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top