SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 4

K.MADHAVA REDDY, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
A. S. Murthy – Appellant
Versus
D. V. S. S. MURTHY – Respondent


MADHAVA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against Judgment and decree in O. S. No. 40/66 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad c. C. C. A. 86/1976. Dt. 26-3-1979.

( 2 ) THE 1st defendant is the appellant herein. The plaintiff s suit for recovery of plaint schedule properties which comprise of a house bearing No. 3-5-4 and 3-3-5 situated at Ramkote, Hyderabad and for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 9,725/- and a sum of Rs. 13,000/- being the value of the moveable property was decreed by the trial Court against deferdants 1 to 5.

( 3 ) THE 1st defendant is the son of the 1st plaintiff The 2nd defendent is the father-in-law of the 1st defendant. The 3rd defendant is tbc power of Attorney holder of the plaintiff and the 4th defendant is the tenant of the suit house. The 5th defendant is the purchaser of the suit house from the 1st defendant, Dr. Brahmanandam, the 1st plaintiff had secured a Life interest in the suit house under a will executed by his wife on 10-3-1960. II is his case that while he was living in that bouse, on 25-2-1965 at about 3-00 p. M. defendants 1 and 2 entered his house dragged him out and forcibly took him in a taxi to Madugula











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top