SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 40

P.A.CHOUDHARY
D. Satyanarayana Murty – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) THE matter arises under the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the Act), Section 6 of the Act excludes the application of all other analogous (provisions) to the construction or reconstruction of a building or the use, or the installation of any machinery in any place or building to be used exclusively for the holding of cinematography exhibitions. The Act directs that in every such case, an application for license or permission shall be made to the licensing authority under the Act in accordance with the Rules made in that behalf. Petitioner satisfied all the Rules and made a proper application to the competent authority which is the District Revenue Officer Guntur, for the grant of a permission to construct a cinema theater in T. S. Nos. 541 and 542 of Kothapeta, Guntur Town. That application was made (?) by the Distt. Revenue Officer on 30-9-74 under R. 9. By reason of these proceedings of the District Revenue Officer dated 30-9-74, the petitioner became entitled to construct a cinema theater in the aforesaid T. S. Nos, 541 and 542 Kothapeta, Guntur Town. But one of the limitations subject to which this permission is grante













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top