SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 105

C.KONDAIAH, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
A. S. Mehta and Co. – Appellant
Versus
Dwawn Mills Ltd. – Respondent


RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE Plaintiffs are the appellants. They are a parthership firm, the partners being one Amba Ben Mebata and Santa Ben Mehata. These two ladies have constituted themselves as partners on 14-2-1961 but the firm was registered under section 59 of the Indian Partnership Act on 30-12-1971. Ex. A-1 which is the extract from the Registrar of Firms, evidences this partnership. Sri R. N. Mebata, (P,w. 1) is the son of Amba Ben Mehata, one of the afore-said partners. Under Ex. A-2 dated 21-11-1963. These two partners have constituted P. W. 1 as their General Power of Attorney agent. Santa Ben Mehata died during the pendency of the appeal in this court. Appellants 2 to 6 were brought on record as her Legal Representatives.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-Firm is the owner of the suit property. The suit property was leased to the defendants under Ex. A-10 dated 15-5-1964, in terms of which, the lease shall commence from 1-4-1964, and should initially run for a period ot 21/2 years with an option given to the defendants to renew the lease for a further period of five years on the same terms and conditions. The defendants have exercised their option for renewal. The total period o
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top