SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 108

ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Muddada Chayanna – Appellant
Versus
G. Veerabhadrarao – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the Subordinate Judge. Srikakulam, dated 15-2-1974 rejecting the plaint filed by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant herein. The suit was instituted against defendants 1 to 4 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 98,355-36 with subsequent interest at 6 per cent per annum towards damages for irregularities in conducting the sale of movable property. Defendant 1 is one Sri G. Veerabhadra Rao who was working as the then (principal) Subordinate Judge. Srikakulam. Defendant 2 is the receiver who has been appointed by the 1st defendant. Defendant 3 is the executive Officer of Devasthanam who filed the execution petition for executing the decree and defendant 1 is the advocate who appears for defendant 3. The case of the plaintiff is that for realisation of balance of the decretal amount in O. S. l /63 the 3rd defendant representing the decree holder deities got bled E. P. 64/72. The 4th defendant is the advocate who filed the execution petition. The standing crop belonging to the plaintiff was got attached. E. A. 351/72 dated 8-12-1972 was filed asking for the appointment of a receiver to get the attached property sold Sr





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top