SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 89

ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, K.A.SWAMI
P. Subbarao – Appellant
Versus
M. VEERAIAH – Respondent


ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants are the defendants in O. S. No. 27 of 1979. Subcourt, warangal. The suit was filed by the respondent herein for dissolu tion of partnership, for rendition of" accounts and other consequential reliefs.

( 2 ) THE Plaintiff and the defendants bad executed a partnership deed on 16th July, 1976 and were carrying on the business running a temporary cinema theatre and display of films in the village of Govindaraopet, Mulug taluk, Warangal District. The case of the respondent-plaintiff was that in view of the various facts and circumstances set out in the plaint and the hostile conduct of the defendants, the business of the firm could not be carried on and the firm could not be continued with the plaintiff and defendants as partners, and it was therefore necessary that the firm should be dissolved. The suit was filed on 9-3-1979. On the 19th of March, 1979, the defendants filed I. A. 256 of 1979 praying that the Court may stay all proceedings in the suit in exercise of its power under section 34 of the Arbitration act. The defendants stated that Clause 18 of the partnership deed provided that any dispute arising between the partners in regard to a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top