( 1 ) THE petitioner is plaintiff. He instituted the suit for an injunction to restrain the defendants from disturbing his possession and working of the Visakha Flour mill (which will hereinafter be referred to as "the Mill" ). He obtained in the trial Court temporary injunction pending the suit. The appellate Court vacated that injunction. This revision is for setting aside the order of the appellate Court and for the restoration of the trial Court s order granting temporary injunction.

( 2 ) THE mill is located in Visakhapatnam. The premises was originally owned by the 2nd defendant. The 1st defendant is the son-in-law of the 2nd defendant. The 3rd defendant is the 2nd defendant s son. The 4th defendant is a relation of the 2nd defendant. The 2nd defendant executed gift deeds endowing a 6 annas share of the mill to the 3rd defendant, another 6 annas share to the 4th defendant and a 2 annas share to the 1st defendant and retained for himself the 2 annas share. In the year 1970, the defendants 1 to 4 leased out the mill under a registered lease deed dated 10th June, 1970 to the plaintiff on an annual rental of rupees one lakh. The lease was for four years and it came into effect by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document