P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU J, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has preferred this revision against the ordar dated 19-9-1978 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge Anantapur in Crl. A. No. 66/77, wherein the Appellate Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence under section 417 IPC. , but remanded the matter to the lower court for fresh disposal by directing the lower court to frame a charge under section 417 IPC. and giving liberty to the complainant to adduce such evidence as may be necessary and also to give an opportunity to hear the accused and dispose of the case according to law.

( 2 ) WHAT had happened in this case was that a private complaint was filed with the allegation that prior to the marriage of the accused with the complainant, the accused misrepresented that he was a bachelor and had no encumbrances and that his name was Nanheba son of jaffer Beig, and that his father was a landlord at Bangalore. On the basis of this representation the father of the complainant was made to part with Rs. 2,000/- and a gold ring of 0-6-0 weight and several other clothes for the marriage and eventually he married the complainant. Thereafter it came to light that the accused was alr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document