JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE four cases are connected and they can be disposed of together. The matters arise out of execution proceedings relating to the decree in O. S. No. 15 of 1945 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram. The litigation has a long history and the necessary facts for the purpose of deciding the questions involved in those four cases are as follows:- One Vajjula Suryanarayana Murthy filed a reversionary suit O. S. No. 15 of 1945 for possession of various suit schedule properties including items 76 to 79 of the plaint schedule, Defendants 58 to 62 and 82 in the said suit claim to be in possession of these items and disputed the right of the plaintiff to get a decree against them. On the other hand, defendant No. 67 claimed the entire extent of these very same items as belonging to her exclusively. Therefore, there was a triangular contest. In the trial Court there was a decree in favour of the plaintiff as against defendants 58 to 62 and 82 and they were directed to put the plaintiff in possession of certain specified extents in their possession. The claim of defendant No. 67 was negatived and she was also asked to put the plaintiff in possession of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document