SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 8

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY
Vijjrapu Sarayya – Appellant
Versus
Vinnakota Savitramma – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A short but subtle question of general interest and importance is raised for resolution in these revision petitions. The question is whether the expression debt as defined in S. 3 (i) of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Indebtedness (Relief) Act, 1977 (Act No. 7 of 1977), hereinafter referred to as Indebtedness Relief Act includes also Mesne Profits". Before embarking on a consideration of the question, it would be profitable to make plain the facts in one of the cases, as the facts in both the cases are identical. For the sake of convenience, the facts in Civil. Revision petition 19666 of 1977 may be stated.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the judgement debtor in E. P. No. 95 of 1965 in O. S. No. 6 of 1951 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram. He filed a petition under S. 4 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Ordinance 25/76 which has since been repealed and replaced by the Indebtedness Relief Act, claiming that he is a small farmer entitled to the protection of the provision of the said ordinance and that the proceedings in the Execution petition are liable to be abated.

( 3 ) THE decree-holder in his counter-affidavit contended inter alia that the debtor is n






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top