SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 64

T.NARSINGA RAO, K.MADHAVA REDDY
Y. NARENDER – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL MANAGER, BANK STREET, HYDERABAD – Respondent


MADBAVA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise a common question of law as to the interpretation of the expression "continuous service for not less than one year" occurring in S. 25 (F) of the industrial Disputes Act in the context of the termination of the petitioners services without complying the requirements of S. 25 (F) of the Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioners who are either members of the clerical or subordinate staff of the Central Bank of India, the respondent herein, were appointed for varying periods from time to time and on the expiry of one such period of service, they were not reappointed. Of these petitioners in W. P. Nos. 2547, 2551, 2556/76 are clerks belonging to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. The petitioners in W. P. Nos. 2548, 2549 ,2550, 2552, 2559, 2561, 2s63, 2564, 2636, 2638 and 3122 of 1976 also are all members of the clerical staff bat belong to the non-schduled castes and non-scheduled tribes. The petitioners in W. P. Nos. 2554, 2557, 2558, 2560, and 2562 and 2633/76 are members of the subordinate staff.

( 3 ) AS the question of law that is raised is common to all the writ petitions, suffice to mention th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top