SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 134

C.KONDAIAH, LAKSHMAIAH
R. V. J. SASTRY – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA, DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEYS, N. R. VIJAYARAGHAVAN – Respondent


LAKSHMAIAH J, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the judgment-debtor is directed against the order and decree passed in E. P. No. 15 of 1975 on the tile of the Principal Subordinate judge, Visakhapatnam, dt. 12-7-1976.

( 2 ) BANK of India, Visakhapatnam, represented by its duly constituted attorney, the first respondent herein filed an execution petition seeking the execution of a money decree against the appellant requesting the court below to arrest the appellant and send mm to civil prison after nonce for realisation ot tne E. P. amount in a sum of Rs. 21, 291-63 ps. That petition was ordered which is now appealed against. That order reads thus : "balance not paid. Adjournment petition dismissed. Judgment- debtor have means to pay as per affidavit. Arrest judgment-debtors 1, 2 and 4 by 3-8-1976".

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the appellant contended that the above decision of the court below directing the arrest of the judgment-debtors is not in contormity with the mandatory provisions of precedural law whereas the learned counsel tor the respondents contended that the decision was quite legal, proper and valid.

( 4 ) THE point therefore that arises for consideration is whether the order di








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top