SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 183

T.NARSINGA RAO
ORUGUNATI RANGANAYAKAMMA ALIAS VENKATARANGANAYAKAMMA – Appellant
Versus
Maduri Lakshminarasamma – Respondent


T. NARASINGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE Civil Revision Petition is filed by the 2nd defendant against the order of the District Munsif, Chirala, whereunder he allowed the petition of the plaintiff for the appointment of a commissioner to examine a witness for the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff laid a suit for declaration and possession of certain properties on the strength of a will said to have been executed by one krishnavenamma on 7-11-1969. The case of the plaintiff, who is the sister of the said Krishnavenamma, is that prior to the death of Krishnavenamma, she was undergoing treatment at a Hospital at Ongole and that on 7-11-1969, she executed a will in the Hospital. The said Krishnavenamma died later, on 14-12-1969. The 2nd defendant is said to be the daughter of the said krishnavenamma. The will purports to bequeath the entire properties of Krishnavenamma in favour of the plaintiff to the exclusion of the 2nd defendant. The suit is resisted by the 2nd defendant inter alia on the ground that the said will is a forged one and that the husband of the plaintiff in connivance of the attestors and others brought a false will into existence. The doctor, that is, the private practitioner at O






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top