K.A.MUKTADAR
C. Sreeamulu – Appellant
Versus
Rangaswamy – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner filed a complaint in the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, secunderabad out of which C. C. 436 of 1977 arises. In that complaint the petitioner herein has made N. K. Subhramanyam as Accused-I and V. Rangeswamy as Accused-2, and according to the petitioner, the date of occurrence april 1977. The fact alleged in the complaint, according to the petitioner, make out a cause under Sections 409 and 420 IPC. Another complaint has been filed by A-2 in C. C. 436 of 1977 in that complaint the date Sub-Divisonal judicial Magistrate, Tirupur. In that complaint the date of occurrence is stated to be 20th June 1977. Rangaswamy, who is the Complainant before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tirupur has made Sriramulu as A-1 and GVS. Ranga Rao as A-2. Now, GVS. Rangarao, A-2, before the Sub-Divisional judicial Magistrate, Tirupur, is not ihe accused in C. C. 436 of 1977 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, nor is Subrahmanyam, a-1, in C. C. No. 436 of 1977 on the file of the Xt Metropolitan- magistrate, Secunderabad, as accused in the complaint file before the Sub-Divisional judicial Magistrate, Tirupur. The facts alleged in the compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.