Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : A.RAGHUVIR, A.SAMBASIVA RAO
Haji Begum - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 08-10-78
FOREST ACT - SEC. 44, 45 - SEIZURE OF FOREST PRODUCE AND TOOLS - OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO FOREST OFFICER - REPORT TO AUTHORISED OFFICER OR MAGISTRATE - MAGISTRATE'S POWER TO DISPOSE OF PROPERTY - DUAL PROCEEDINGS NOT PERMISSIBLE.
Fact of the Case:
A vehicle carrying sandalwood billets without authorized marks and permit was seized by the Forest Range Officer. The owner of the vehicle claimed ownership and sought delivery of the vehicle. The Second Metropolitan Magistrate ordered delivery of the vehicle to the owner subject to certain conditions.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Forest Range Officer had two options under Section 44 of the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967: either to produce the forest produce and tools before the Authorised Officer for confiscation or to make a report of the seizure to the nearest Magistrate. The court held that the Magistrate had the power to dispose of the forest produce and tools once a report was received by them.
Issues: Whether the Magistrate had the jurisdiction to order the release of the vehicle seized under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Magistrate had the jurisdiction to order the release of the vehicle seized under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. The court held that the Forest Range Officer had two options under Section 44 of the Act: either to produce the forest produce and tools before the Authorised Officer for confiscation or to make a report of the seizure to the nearest Magistrate. The court held that the Magistrate had the power to dispose of the forest produce and tools once a report was received by them.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ appeal and dismissed the writ petition.
( 1 ) THE Forest Range Officer, Hyderabad South on November 11, 1977 near Police Station, Hussaini Alam intercepted A. P. Y. 5289 (the vehicle) and found the vehicle carrying 460 Kgs. of sandalwood billets without the authorised marks and permit under the Andhra pradesh Sandalwood and Red Sandalwood Transport Rules, 1969. The vehicle and the billets were seized under a panchanama. Md. Yousuf, who was at the wheel, was arrested. He is averred to have confessed the offence of having transported the billets from Shimoga of Karnataka State for delivery to Sri Md. Ibrahim of Chandulal baradari. The Range Officer thereafter produced the forest produce and the vehicle before the Divisional Forest Officer, Hyderabad and lodged a report before the Second Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad of the seizure of forest produce and the vehicle, the arrest of Md. Yousef and his judicial custody for fifteen days was sought. A bailable warrant was prayed for the arrest of the absconding owner of the bllfets. Before the Magistrate Smt. Haji Begum claimed she is the owner and pending the trial sought delivery of the vehicle. Her request was not opposed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court there upon ordered delivery of A. P. Y. 5289 to the owner and imposed condi. tions (per order on November 19, 1977 in Crl. M. P. No. 2166 of 1977) on Haji Begum to execute a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with a surety for ikesum. The Registration certificate of the vehicle was ordered to be deposited in the Court. The vehicle was directed to be produced on every adjourned hearing of the enquiry and no transfer of the vehicle was to be made; colour" and parts of the vehicle meanwhile were ordered not to be "chanced".
( 2 ) THE order of the Second Metropolitan Magistrate was assailed in a petition (W. P. No. 5540 of 1977) under Article 226 of the constitution of India by the Forest Range Officer in this Court. Haji begum was the first respondent and the Second Metropolitan magistrate was impleaded the second respondent in the writ petition. The ratio in the case of State of A. P. vs. P. K. Mahammad (1) 1978 (1) a. P. L J. 391 was followed ard on 23rd January, 1978, the writ petition was allowed. The Second Metropolitan Magistrate was declared "to have no jurisdiction to direct the release of the lorry (the vehicle ). The correctness of the view in the writ petition is assailed in appeal by the owner of the vehicle.
( 3 ) THE Andhra Pradesh Forest Act I of 1967 (the Act) was amended by Act XVII of 1976, with effect from December, 17,1976. The Forest Act thus amended contain provisions for arrest of male factors, confiscation of forest produce and "tools" used in the offence to include vehicles. Special provisions are incorporated for trial of offenders before the criminal court and minimum punishment is prescribed under the Act and Rules. Section 44 by the amending act was radically altered by the Act XVII of 1976. Section 45 was substituted, Section 50 was renumbered adding clause one to the section. Section 58-A inserted as not to have barred imposition of penalty under section 58 of the Act in addition to the confiscation of forest produce.
( 4 ) SEC. 53 of the Act recites a forest officer not below the rank of a forest guard can arrest a person, if the offender refused to give the name, residence or give false name, false residence or when the presence of the offender cannot be secured easily. The person arrested is required to be produced before the nearest Magistrate within twenty four hours for further orders of the Magistrate. A forest Officer not below the rank of a Forest Range Officer can seize the forest produce together with "tools, ropes, chains, boats vehicles and cattle" employed in commission of the offence. The Range officer after the goods are seized has to put marks indicating the goods have been seized, and may keep them in his custody or with a forest guard or village headman till the offence is compounded or in his discret
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.