SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 295

JEEVAN REDDY, LAKSHMAIAH
Palur Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Potta Venkata Reddy – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS have filed this civil Miscellaneous Appeal against an order of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Anantapur vacating the temporary injunction pending the suit. The injunction has been vacated mainly on the ground that granting of such injunction is prohibited by section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The correctness of that view is challenged herein. It is necessary to state a few facts for a proper appreciation of the question arising herein.

( 2 ) DEFENDANTS 1 to 3 filed a declaration of their holding under section 8 of the Act. In the declaration they stated that the five items of land concerned herein, with a total extent of Ac. 63-07 cents have been sold by them to plaintiffs 1 to 7 herein, under an agreement of sale, dated 29th November, 1971 for a consideration of Rs. 45,000. During the course of enquiry before the Land reforms Tribunal, the 5th plaintiff Was also examined in support of the said contention. The Tribunal, however, rejected the contention and included the five items in question in the holding of defendants 1 to 3. No appeal was filed aga
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top