SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 348

T.NARSINGA RAO
UPPALAPATI VENKATA RATNAM – Appellant
Versus
MEKA VENKATA SRAVANTHI DEVIS – Respondent


T. NARASINGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner and the two respondents in both the revision petitions are common. C. R. P. No. 6725/78 arises out of E. P. No. 290/78 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada, directing attachment of a sum of Rs. 11,795- deposited by the judgment-debtor in e. P. 181/79 arising in O. S. No. 6/1972. C. R. P. No. 6726/1978 arises out of an exparte attachment order made in E. P. 291/78 for attachment of the decree passed in O. S, No. 6/1972 on the file of the District Court, Krishna, which was obtained by the revision petitioner herein. Since these two revision petitions were argued together, they are disposed of by a common order. Facts leading to these two revision petitions briefly stated are these.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner filed O. S. 6/1972 on the file of the district Judge, Krishna, for specific performance of an agreement of sale entered into by the parents of the respondents herein. The case of the plaintiff-revision petitioner was that he paid a consideration of Rs. 82,500/- and that as he was put in possession of the suit land measuring nearly Acs. 56, he also made some improvement. The suit was resisted and ultimately the Supre














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top