CHENNAKESAV REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order of the District Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmunddry, in EP. No. 15 of 1973 in O. S. No. 76 of 1861 dismissing the E. P. as not maintainable The appellant filed an application for compensation under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter referred to as the Act before the District Judge cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal East Godavari at Rajahmundry, and obtained an award for Rs. 12,600. He filed E. P. No. 15 of 1973, before the District Judge for the enforcement of the award of compensation against the respondents. The respondents resisted the execution on the ground that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the E. P. Upholding their contention the learned first Additional District Judge, dismissed the E. P.

( 2 ) THE short question and the sole question that arises for consideration is. Whether the E. P, filed before the District Judge for the enforcement of the award of compensation is not maintainable. The relevant provisions concerning the controversy are Section 110-E of the Act and Rule 530-A of the Rules framed by the State Government under Section 111-A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document