SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(AP) 419

N. SWAMYNATH – Appellant
Versus
B. N. RAMAKRISHIA – Respondent


K. A. MUKTADAR, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioners before me named N. Swaminath and N. Lakshman, are alleged to be the partners in the firm knows as Annapurna Exhibitrs. Proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P. C. , were initiated and preliminary order was passed. During the pendency of the proceedings R5 who was the proprietor of the Annapurna Films and also a partner of the Annapurna exhibitors died. Petition was filed by party No. 1 to bring not only the partners of Annapurna Exhibitors on record as the legal representatives of the firm but also to bring on record the wife and children of R-5 as legal representatives. The learned Executive Magistrate after hearing the parties passed an order on 12-7-1978 allowing the petition. In doing so, the learned Magistrate Bad observed that no hard and fast rule was laid down as to who would be the parties concerned and that besides the parties involved in the dispute other parties having interest in the subject-matter of the dispute and parties having connection with the possession of the subjectmatter of dispute in some capacity or the other would also be impleaded as parties. He, therefore, directed that summons should be issued to the parties at the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top