SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 10

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, S.MADHUSUDAN RAO
Makkala Narsimlu – Appellant
Versus
Gunnala Raghunandan Rao – Respondent


SAMBASIVA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE principal question raised in this Letters Patent Appeal is about the compensation awarded by our learned brother Sriramulu, j. , for failure to perform a contract. The defendant, against whom the compensation was awarded by our learned brother, has preferred this appeal.

( 2 ) THE matter arose thus :- The appellants executed an agreement of sale Ex. A-1 dated 29-3-66 in favour of the respondent agreeing to sell a house for Rs. 20,000. A sum of Rs. 4,000 was paid on that date by way of advance or earnest money. The vendor agreed to get two things done within nine months there from. Once is to get a further sale deed in his favour from whom he had purchased. The second condition was that he would vacate the tenants from the house and give vacant possession to the purchaser within the period of nine months. That was why the parties fixed he period of nine months for performance of the contract. Once the vendor was ready with these two requirements, the purchaser was to pay the balance of Rs. 16,000 and to take a sale deed. However, the vendor was unable to perform either of the two conditions with the result that the agreement could not be performed. The pu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top