SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 46

PUNNAIAH
Sakalabhaktula Vykunta Rao – Appellant
Versus
Made Appalaswamy – Respondent


PUNNAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the District Muncif, Tekkali in I. A. No. 470/1976 in O. S. No. 75/1976.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are the defendants 1 and 2 in the suit O. S. No. 75/1976 which was filed for permanent injunction. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed I. A. No. 369/1976 for the grant of temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. The plaintiff filed some affidavits in support of the above mentioned I. A. One of the affidavits was given by the Village Karnam. The learned District Muncif granted interim injunction and issued notice to the respondents-defendants who are the petitioners herein. The petitioners after receiving the notice, filed a petition for vacating the interim injunction. The petitioners-defendants filed I. A. No. 470/1976 requesting the Court to summon the Village Karnam so that they would cross- examine him, as his affidavit contained certain false averments. This petition was opposed by the respondents-plaintiff. The learned District Muncif gave the following reasons for dismissing it :" Absolutely there is no allegation to the effect that affidavits filed in support of the plaintiffs case are conflicti








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top