SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 71

K.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Merla Venkata Rao – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , represented by the Special Tahsildar, Land Reforms, Kakinada – Respondent


K. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed under section 21 of the Andhra pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The petitioner filed a declaration under section 8 (1) of the Act showing that he was holding Ac. 119 82 cents of land. His wife filed a separate declaration showing an extent of Ac. 125-26 cents as held by her. Both the declarations were clubbed together as the petitioner and his wife constitute a family unit within the meaning of section 3 (f) of the Act. The declarations were referred to the Tahsildar and deputy Tahsildars of the concerned villages, and they submitted their verification reports. In the verification report relating to the declaration filed by the wife, it was mentioned that the extents of Ac. 20-7. cents of Karapa village, Ac, 2-61 cents of Chinamamidada village. 0-14 cents of Velangi village, belonging to her, were not shown in her declarator,. Survey No. 253/8 was wrongly mentioned as survey No. 253 with an extent of Ac. 2-40 cents while the correct extent is Ac. 2-27 cents The Tahsildar, Peddapuram, mentioned in his report that the lands of the extent of Ac. 41-39 c













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top