SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 121

ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, PUNNAIAH
State Of A. P. , Special Tahsildar, Authorised Officer Land Reforms Nellore – Appellant
Versus
Tikkavarapu Balarami Reddy – Respondent


ALLADI KUPPUSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions arise out of proceedings under the andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (referred to in this judgment as the Act ). As a common question of law arises in these two revision petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. It is admitted by the learned counsel on both sides that the facts in the two cases are almost identical and the decision in one will govern the other. It is therefore sufficient if we deal with C. R. P. No. 1313/76.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed a declaration under section 8 (1) of the Act- in annexure III to the declaration, he gave particulars of Ac. 5-09 cents of wet land and Ac. 50-021 cents of dry land which he had sold on different occasions between 24-1-1971 and 27-3-1972. Under Section 7 of the Act, it is provided as follows:" (I) Where on or after the 24th January, 1971 but before the notified date, any person has transferred whether by way of sale, gift, usufructuary mortgage, exchange, settlement, surrender, or in any other manner whatsoever, any land held by him or created a trust of any land held by him, then the burden of p








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top