CHENNAKESAVA REDDY
SATYAVOLU VENKATA BHASKARA UMAMAHESWARA VARAPRASADA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
POTTI VEERARAJU AND S. RAMA RAO – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises out of execution proceedings initiated by the auction-purchaser, the first respondent herein under Order 21, Rule 93 C. P. C. for recovery of the purchase money and other expenses from the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor, the petitioner and the second respondent respectively in the revision petition. The decree-holder and judgment-debtor are brothers. The decree-holder obtained three money decrees against his brothers in three suits in o. S. No. 17 of 1956, O. S No. 63/55 and O. S. No. 2 of 1956 on the file of the District Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry. All the three decrees were compromise decrees creating a charge on three items of property belonging tc the judgment-debtor.
( 2 ) IN execution of the decree in O S. No. 17 of 1956. the decree-holder brought item No. 1 of the charged property to sale, in E. P. No, 13 of 1960. The auction was held on 28-8-1961. The first respondent was the highest bidder for Rs. 13. 000/- He deposited into the court the entire sale pries by 6-9-1961 as required under the conditions of sale The sale was posted for confirmation to 19-7-1962. While the matters stood thus, one Karri Mab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.