( 1 ) THE defendant is the appellant, the plaintiff filed the suit for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff s possession cf the land bearing S. No. 203/2 measuring about acres 23. 38 Gts. siiuated in Kalvakunta village. The plaintiff has admitted that the patta of the suit land stood in the name of one Mohammed Bilal but that it was so only nominally. The plaintiff claimed to be in possession and enjoyment of the suit land for a long time. He relied upon the relevant Pabani Patraks and the land revenue receipts for the years 1963, 1964 and 1965 in support of his claim the defendant in his written statement contended that Mohammed bilal was the absolute owner and pattedar of the suit land and that it was in the possession of Bilal till it was attached and custody thereof was taken by the Government on 15-4-1963. The defendant claimed to have purchased the suit property under Ex. B-16 which is a registered sale deed dated 3-8-1965 for a consideration of Rs. 4,000. The defendant also claimed that he was in possession of the suit land which was on the data of the sale as vacant land. It was urged that as the plaintiff had no manner of rig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document