SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 328

LAKSHMAIAH
Mohd. Raheemuddin – Appellant
Versus
Aayesha Begum – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the 1st defendant is against the judgment and decree dated 16th October, 1975 passed by the Addl. Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Secunderabad in A. S. No. 28 of 1974 whereby the learned judge reversed the judgment of the second Asst. Judge, City Civil Court in O. S. No. 149 of 1972.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS 1 and 2 are plaintiffs in O. S. No. 149 of 1972. That suit was instituted against the appellant, the 1st defendant and two other defendants (a) for a declaration that the 1st plaintiff or in the alternative the 2nd plaintiff is the absolute owner of the house bearing Municipal No. 17-6-41 inclusive of the open land and compound wall measuring in all 416-78 square yards situated outside babirpura, Hyderabad; and (b) for restraining by perpetual injunction defendants 1 and 2 or their agents or servants and persons claiming under them from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

( 3 ) THE case for the plaintiffs is that the suit house originally belonged to one by name Halim Bi. On her death, her daughter Noorunissa Begum became the owner. A suit was filed by one named sharifunnisa Begum agai






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top